Sport is generally finance by various forms of lotteries, but the biggest income comes from bets on the outcome of football matches. This is why football believes it has the right to receive more money than other sports. But is it justified that the existing sports federations in Europe receive subsidies from the state and at the same time benefit from the revenues from the sale of television broadcasting rights? What should be the modalities for granting state aid to sport?
The relationship between public and private in the financing of American professional sport is in some ways simpler: all the money remains within the league, which is independent and therefore has no obligation to help other sports. However, a very important and debated point of friction remains, and concerns the tendency of professional teams to take over the costs of the facilities in which they carry out their activities to the local finances of the cities that host the franchises.
European football and the American model
The differences between the US and European systems can be summarize in four characteristic points:
Type of alloy In the American model, the league is said to be close for two reasons: close internally as there is no promotion and relegation mechanism, so new teams are rarely admit and when this happens the decision is vote among the various members of the league; closed to the outside as the teams participate exclusively in the league championships, with rare exceptions. On the contrary, the European model provides that national tournaments have promotion and relegation mechanisms for the participating teams and that some of them participate in supranational tournaments (European and intercontinental cups). Beyond that, club team players are often engage with national teams to compete in continental or world tournaments. For this reason it is say that the structure of the European league 해외축구중계사이트 is open towards.
The difference between the two structures is reflect in the way of experiencing the sporting event:
In the American configuration the competitive balance is privilege so that the league can always offer a compelling show. The extreme case is that of the MLS, the American football sports federation, within which the movements of the players between the different teams take place by decision of the league itself, which thus tends to rebalance the uncertainty of the competition. The actual competition in the US system tends to move towards the leagues, rather than the teams. For example, since 1945 there have been four attempts to form new professional associations competing with the National Football League, of which three have fail and one has been absorb.
On the contrary, in Europe the sports federations are highly hierarchical and do not fear any competition. The competition in this case is all centered on the competitions between the different clubs. This trend is mainly dictate by the open system in force and by the different conception of cheering that exists between American sport and European sport.
On the contrary, the European model provides that national tournaments have promotion and relegation mechanisms for the participating teams and that some of them participate in supranational tournaments
